This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 12:19] – [criticism] yair | tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 12:25] (current) – [criticism] yair | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| good reddit thread with some notable quotes | good reddit thread with some notable quotes | ||
| - | latency varies | + | latency varies. |
| < | < | ||
| AVB is not plug and play on MacOS. It was a few versions ago. Now it’s slightly off-kilter with the implementation found in MOTU’s and RME’s useage. Massive headaches if you pretend it’s as good as Dante’s Virtual Soundcard.\\ | AVB is not plug and play on MacOS. It was a few versions ago. Now it’s slightly off-kilter with the implementation found in MOTU’s and RME’s useage. Massive headaches if you pretend it’s as good as Dante’s Virtual Soundcard.\\ | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| AVB is very low latency between dedicated devices with specific chipsets. Not computers.\\ | AVB is very low latency between dedicated devices with specific chipsets. Not computers.\\ | ||
| - | Why does RME use USB? Because they know what they’re doing.\\ | + | Why does [[https:// |
| - | < | + | < |
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| < | < | ||
| AVB requires specialised chipsets in switches; which makes it a nightmare. Dante and Ravenna work on most reasonable off the shelf managed switch chipsets - so the economies of scale and simplicity of installation / integration does not lie with AVB. | AVB requires specialised chipsets in switches; which makes it a nightmare. Dante and Ravenna work on most reasonable off the shelf managed switch chipsets - so the economies of scale and simplicity of installation / integration does not lie with AVB. | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| </ | </ | ||