This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 11:51] – created yair | tamiwiki:projects:avb [2024/04/06 12:25] (current) – [criticism] yair | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| AVB (Audio Video Bridging) is a protocol that address the lack of a unified, open protocol for video and audio distribution over standard ethernet network. | AVB (Audio Video Bridging) is a protocol that address the lack of a unified, open protocol for video and audio distribution over standard ethernet network. | ||
| - | |||
| - | - [[https:// | ||
| - | - [[https:// | ||
| < | < | ||
| Line 18: | Line 15: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | [[https://support.biamp.com/Tesira/AVB/List_of_AVB-capable_Ethernet_switches|List_of_AVB-capable_Ethernet_switches]] {{tamiwiki: | + | ===== criticism ===== |
| + | good reddit thread with some notable quotes | ||
| + | |||
| + | latency varies. | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | AVB is not plug and play on MacOS. It was a few versions ago. Now it’s slightly off-kilter with the implementation found in MOTU’s and RME’s useage. Massive headaches if you pretend it’s as good as Dante’s Virtual Soundcard.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | When it works, the AVB virtual device adds about ~15ms of latency. (not unlike DVS)\\ | ||
| + | AVB is very low latency between dedicated devices with specific chipsets. Not computers.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why does [[https://rme-audio.de/ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | and special switches are a bitch | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | AVB requires specialised chipsets in switches; which makes it a nightmare. Dante and Ravenna work on most reasonable off the shelf managed switch chipsets | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | PRODUCTS | + | ===== products ===== |
| + | - 150$ AVB to USBC adaptor, **MAC only** [[https:// | ||
| + | - 400$ MOTU AVB Switch [[https:// | ||
| + | - [[https:// | ||
| - | - 150$ AVB to USBC adaptor [B[https:// | ||